Saturday, September 19, 2015

Leaving the CREC Part 2--The Job

Several years elapsed between that engagement and the series of events that transpired and opened our eyes to what was actually going on in the CREC.  We had now been married just over four years and had been through a period of extended unemployment.  Our third child was also born, and spent most of the first two weeks of his life in a NICU unit.  During that NICU stay, Ryan was offered a job at a small accounting firm on the other side of the state in which one of the partners was a deacon at the local CREC church.  One of the senior level staff members attended there as well.  To even further tie us in, I had known the pastor my entire life—literally since birth.  He was also the pastor who had married us.  Therefore, there was no question of where we would be attending church.  We were already part of the CREC, and we held great love and respect for the leader of this church in particular.

Everything started well at the new job.  At the end of the first three months, Ryan was even given a raise.  However, right after that, the partner from the church left the firm and the other church member took his place as partner. And that’s when things went south.

It was only a couple months after Ryan had started the position that the new partner – a prominent member of the church – came into Ryan’s windowless basement office and asked him a question. The firm had a very wealthy tax client in Spokane, and the partner needed a staff accountant to accompany her on a week-long trip to prepare this client’s taxes. Did Ryan want to go, or did he want the partner to ask one of the other staff accountants? Having just moved, and since I was freshly off a c-section, Ryan said that he would go if needed, but if it made no difference, he would rather one of the other staff accounts go because they had no families. This was the wrong answer. We later learned the question was a test of Ryan’s loyalty to firm, of his willingness to place work above family, and he had failed. It was the beginning of the end.

Soon after, as tax season went into full swing, Ryan began to run into ethical dilemmas while doing tax returns. He notices that tax breaks were being given to individuals who hadn’t really earned them. He had to work on projects that gave valuable tax incentivess to people who didn’t qualify for them.  And then, Ryan discovered the quirk in the internal messaging system. The messaging system was a primitive instant messaging system that the partners used to communicate with the staff accounts and each other when they were too busy to leave their offices. And all messages were archived. And that archive was accessible to everyone in case someone needed to reference old message while working on a project. And while searching this archive for a project, Ryan stumbled across something shocking: even though these messages were archived where everyone could see them, the partners used this system to talk about the performance of their staff. He learned that other staff accountants were about to be fired, and that Ryan himself was close to the chopping block. But most disturbing of all, she complained about me wanting Ryan home more during tax season.

Since this partner was a member of the church in good standing, Ryan felt it was time to go to the pastor. He explained his ethical dilemmas, as well as the poor treatment of fellow employees he witnessed on a daily basis. The pastor listened, and talked to the previous partner, who was still a deacon in the church. But the deacon believed the ethical issues were “gray areas.” And the problems of backroom gossip and poor treatment of employees were simply not addressed.

A few months later, in the middle of October, Ryan received another visit from the new partner. This time, she told him he would be let go at the end of the year, and that he needed to start looking for work elsewhere. This deal changed several times, ranging from one week, to “as much time as you need” and back again. The stress was unbearable, and one Sunday morning I cracked. The wife of the deacon who used to be a partner asked me how I was doing, and I lost it.  It was a mix between sobbing and yelling about how apparently cheating on taxes was a “gray” area, that lying about Ryan’s work ethic was just fine, and the pastor, who I thought cared, obviously didn’t.

Soon we, the partner, and her husband were called into a meeting with the pastor and the other two elders of the church.   I was so shaken up I was using my inhaler repeatedly.  The meeting mostly consisted of the pastor wanting everyone to exchange apologies and call it good.  Ryan repeated that he was thankful for the job multiple times.  However, it was mentioned several times that I was unsupportive of Ryan’s career, which floored me.  Ryan’s boss’s response was “well, this comes from your facebook page, Amber ‘well this sucks.’”  When I denied having said any such thing the pastor wouldn’t hear me out, and Ryan’s boss insisted that I had.  I was asked to apologize, which I did, and that ended it.  I was rather in shock over it.

When we got home I combed through my facebook page for at least two hours, looking for that incriminating post.  This must have been it, because it was the closest thing there was—“Nearly 50 degrees today! I got to enjoy a long walk with my husband. During tax season, an unexpected day off feels like a vacation. We can't get over how wonderful it is to rest and enjoy one another's company!

Ryan continued meeting regularly with the pastor over the last few weeks of his employment with the firm. He continued to bring up ethical issues and the malicious gossip continuing to be archived in the company’s message system. And several of those messages continued to be about me. When Ryan told the pastor about this, the pastor told Ryan to stop talking to me about work. There was another member of the church who had had similar experiences working for the firm, and she valiantly came to our defense, but she too was told to stop talking, to “stop encouraging them (meaning us) in their sin.”
Thanksgiving came and went, and we tried one more time to talk to the pastor. He came to our house, and we pleaded with him to tell us why we were being thrown under the bus, why the new partner was being so ardently defended, and the answer we received from him was this: “I don’t have to explain my ministry to you.”

That was the end. We started attending another local church, only to find out that the CREC pastor had contacted the pastor of this new church out of “professional courtesy” to explain our situation. We had nowhere left to go.  And it was at that point that Ryan drafted the following letter which we sent to the elders of our former church (names have been removed):


Dear Elders of [the church],

We want you to know, first and foremost, that the decisions we've made and actions we've taken over the past few months have not been knee-jerk reactions. We have been working slowly and carefully through many issues regarding my former employment with [the firm] and our membership with [the church]. Alas, the two became inextricably tied.

The chief problem, as I see it, is that you and I have different ideas as to the nature of the crux of the matter.

Per my many conversations with [the pastor], here is what I think you believe to be the central problem. As you stated in your letter to us dated February 10, 2013, "the forgiveness extended from both parties was intended to lay a foundation for dealing with future issues." Therefore, since there has been no progress toward restoration, the forgiveness on our part must not have been genuine, or if it was at the time, it is no longer present. We have become bitter, in your view, and have refused to make amends, either with the [new partner] or with you, until there is some kind of justice dispensed, namely [the new partner] being required by the church to either secure my position with the firm or face a disciplinary action.

Here is what we believe to be the crux of the matter: Since the elders do not wish to acknowledge the long and ongoing mistreatment of employees at [the firm], particularly by [the new partner], and since they do not believe such treatment has been ongoing since our mid October meeting with the [the new partner] despite the evidence I have tried time and again to present, continuing to attend [the church] would be to unnecessarily subject ourselves to abuse. To put it simply, the elders believe no wrongdoing is taking place, and we are tired of being slapped in the face by the elders and by [the new partner]. We have turned the other cheek to no end, and we will continue to do so, but if staying away from [the church] will take us out of striking range, who can blame us?

However, as much grief as we have received from [the new partner], we have received more from [the pastor]. As he put it during one of the last times I spoke with him face-to-face, "I believe that you believe these things are happening." It was then I knew that nothing I could ever say in the matter would make a difference. I was, in his eyes, a "bitter" soul, and a man who is bitter is to be pitied, but not trusted.

"Bitterness" is a broad and powerful term. When someone is labeled as "bitter," every word spoken and action performed by that person is scrutinized and doubted. No real evidence is required to condemn a "bitter" person because no matter how much truth may fall from his lips, all that need be said is, "I wouldn't listen to him; he's a very bitter person." It is a stigma that is almost impossible to shake once applied, and it becomes a powerful weapon in the hands of those who have dealings with the person in question. It became such a weapon in the hands of [the new partner], a weapon handed to her in an email from [the pastor].

Throughout our dealings with [the pastor] regarding our current troubles, he always refrained from discussing his work or communications with [the new partner]. [The pastor] has always believed that we must deal with our own sins and leave [the new partner] to him. In general, that is a wise course of action. However, the reverse has not held true. While [the pastor] refused to discuss [the new partner’s] character with me, he did not offer me the same courtesy. Not only did [the pastor] describe me as "bitter" in an email to [the new partner], but he also discussed our reasons for leaving the church, the nature of his meetings with me, and which church we were currently attending.

Because the elders of the church refused to believe [the new partner] had done anything wrong, they failed to recognize the danger of giving her such personal information about myself and my family. I had warned [the pastor] many times of the malicious gossip spread throughout the firm by [the new partner], and it was no surprise to find information about our status with the church in the hands of others in the firm. I have attached a publicly archived memo from [the new partner to [another partner] in which she discusses an email from [the pastor] regarding our separation from [the church]. The message was filled with several exaggerations, false assumptions, and untruths, as is usually the case, and I won't bother to enumerate them.

Not long after our meeting with the [new partner] and the elders in mid October, [the new partner] resumed her malicious conversations with [another partner], all the while presenting a smiling face to me. Toward the end of my employment with the firm I was told I was being let go because the firm had over-hired, and I was given a positive letter of recommendation, yet her messages to [the other partner] told another story entirely. In fact, when the Employment Department called [the new partner] in particular to verify my status, she told them I had been fired (as opposed to being laid off), but could give no reasons as to why. Fortunately, the Employment Department determined I had been discharged without cause, and I am now receiving unemployment payments.

All of this to say that [the new partner] has been saying one thing and doing another since our troubles began. Most grievous has been her treatment of Amber. In our meeting with the [new partner] in mid October, [she] vehemently denied badmouthing Amber behind her back, and yet, in the attached memo you'll find yet another example of [the new partner] spreading gossip about my wife that is completely untrue. This is by far the worst thing [the new partner] has done to us, far worse than taking away my job. But the greatest wound we have received in this regard came not from [the new parter], but from the elders, when they assumed [the new partner’s] words were true despite the evidence speaking to the contrary, despite [the new partner’s] reputation in the community, and despite the lifelong relationship [the pastor] has had with Amber.

With the elders considering us guilty of bitterness, with the congregation knowing only of Amber's "outburst" and not the reasons behind it, and with [the new partner] keeping close track of our church attendance for her own ends, the Sabbath ceased to be a day of rest for us.

Those are the reasons we have left the church. Even the [other] church is no longer a haven for us as [the CREC pastor] has been in regular contact with [the new pastor]. Since the elders refuse to recognize [the new partner’s] duplicity, and because of the powerful stigma of bitterness that has been attached to us, we have no more desire to pursue the matter. We wish simply to be left alone. As for what to tell the members of [the CREC church], I don't believe it matters. So long as the elders refuse to hold [the new partner] accountable for her actions, thereby restoring our good names, it is impossible for anyone to know or accept the truth. So long as the elders' impressions of us continue to be based upon assumptions and not upon facts (we have never before "left" a church as [the CREC pastor] believed, and I had no "part-time accounting work" as of the writing of your letter), reconciliation simply is not possible, however much we wish for it.

We do not sit in our house stewing in our own bitterness. In fact, we don't think much about these issues anymore unless pressed to do so. We search for work, we enjoy our children, and we live our lives. You probably won't believe it, but we truly did forgive [the new partner] that night in October, and we still do.

We forgive you as well.

In Christ,

Ryan Myers, on behalf of the Myers family


We never received a response to the above letter. Two months later, we were in Boise, with Ryan starting a new job, a job that invalidated everything that the partners of the firm thought of him, a place where his abilities and work ethic quickly elevated him to management. 

Prior to our experiences, we had always heard stirrings.  Stories of people who had been somehow abused by church members, church leadership, or both.  However, the stories were always tidily explained away, and the term “bitter” was generally attached to the victim in the story.   They weren’t willing to forgive.  Weren’t submissive to church leadership.  Weren’t willing to reconcile.  It wasn’t until we were on the receiving end of those accusations that we realized that we needed to revisit what we knew about those other cases.  That the church we had committed ourselves to for the past several years was throwing people to the wolves.  And that we needed to rethink the theological tenets we thought we firmly believed that had gotten us to this place.

We’ll try to explore those tenets some more in part three.

4 comments:

  1. Thank you for posting this. The CREC has a long reach and affects people in my area (on the other side of the country)

    ReplyDelete
  2. It's hard to watch pastors go steadily downhill in the pastoral care department while at the same time exponentially increasing in the pride/know how department.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm following this with interest. My husband was spiritually abused by a church years ago.

    ReplyDelete
  4. following this issue as well as I was spiritually abused by a church growing up.

    ReplyDelete